Interesting reading
I hope you guys don't tell anybody. I borrowed a couple of articles from the Los Angeles Times that I thought you'd be interested in. The first is a column by Melissa Rohlin. She talks about being a basketball fan but not a WNBA fan. The second is a response by Phoenix Mercury All-Star Diana Taurasi.
Why this woman is a fan of basketball, but not the WNBA
Like most people, she watches sports to be entertained, and that means when it comes to hoops, it’s all about the NBA.
By Melissa Rohlin
September 20, 2008
An explanation from one woman basketball fan – not a women’s basketball fan – who did not plan on being at Staples Center for the Sparks’ opening game in the playoffs against Seattle.
I have played basketball my entire life and dreamed of playing in the WNBA. I did anything and everything to accomplish my goal – everything except watch the WNBA.
I was the first person to show up at practice and I was the last person to leave the gym. Basketball was my life. I was so obsessed with the sport that my parents would punish any perceived bad behavior by forbidding me from going to the gym.
During this period, I watched every Lakers game and studied Kobe’s dunks and leaping skills, but I never tried to learn the moves and skills of the women with whom I actually dreamed of playing.
I returned to my alma mater, Palisades High, and discovered that I am not alone. Of the 12 girls hoping to make the basketball team this fall with whom I spoke, only one says that she regularly watches the WNBA. The majority say they regularly watch the NBA.
I wish that I had more interest in the WNBA. The players have doubtlessly overcome gender prejudices and a lot of adversity to achieve their status. They are examples of discipline and focus and are advancing the cause of gender equality while simultaneously destroying gender norms.
Unfortunately, I watch basketball to be entertained. I do not watch it to support a cause. And, quite frankly, men’s basketball is far more entertaining than women’s basketball. Simply stated: Men jump higher, run faster, and hit harder than women.
The celebration and media hype that ensued after Candace Parker’s first dunk in the WNBA emphasizes the difference between men’s and women’s basketball. Could you imagine if each player in the NBA received that kind of attention after a dunk debut? It would be comical. Dunking is practically as much of a requisite for playing in the NBA as dribbling is for the WNBA.
I am not trying to understate the significance of Parker’s feat. Her dunk was historic because she is a woman. But, why would basketball fans want to watch the WNBA where something generic is considered historic?
Not everyone feels the way I do. One Palisades varsity basketball hopeful, Dominique Scott, finds the WNBA more exciting than the NBA because she can better relate to women’s moves and tactics. She thinks that the showboating and dunking of the NBA detracts from the purity of the sport.
Unfortunately, most people do not agree with Dominique’s perspective, and since there is not much fan interest in the WNBA, there is also not much media coverage. “Studies have shown that men’s sports receive as much as 90% airtime as compared to a mere 7% airtime for women,” said Stephanie Sweet, who has a master’s degree in kinesiology from Long Beach State.
We are constantly bombarded with advertisements for the NBA. Even though my grandmother thinks that the Lakers are a football team, she still knows the dates and times of their games.
The WNBA, on the other hand, is virtually absent in the media. People have to actively research and seek out game times. Leora Sheily, a 16-year-old Palisades basketball player, said, “If I knew about Sparks games, I would watch them.”
Another reason the WNBA is underappreciated is the lack of male interest in the game. Very few of my friends who are girls share my passion for basketball, but most of my guy friends (even those who have no interest in playing the sport) love watching it. These guys only have an interest in the NBA. The WNBA is as foreign to them as cricket is to most Americans.
Another Palisades player, Ksenya Schvchuk, said: “Half of the fun of watching basketball is debating the games with my guy friends, and since none of them watch the WNBA, I have lost interest.”
Sweet explained that most guys accept women competing only in feminine sports such as volleyball and tennis. Men do not like watching women clad in baggy, long shorts competing in contact sports. This image directly opposes the prototype of the feminine woman who is revered in today’s society, and, as Sweet says, “Sports is a reflection of society.”
A lot of young female basketball players also shy away from watching the WNBA because of its reputation of having a large homosexual fan base. Some heterosexual girls are afraid that they themselves will be considered gay if they associate with something reputed as gay. Unfortunately, this discourages many young women from watching and talking about a sport in which they would otherwise have interest.
Even though my dream of playing professional basketball evaporated in high school, I still love watching the sport. Well, I love watching guys play the sport. The WNBA is for me, as it is for the majority of the potential Palisades varsity basketball players, nothing but an afterthought.
If the WNBA hopes to survive, it must at least pique the interest of female basketball players. I want the WNBA to survive. For now, by discussing our lack of interest in the WNBA, we are at least bringing it some attention.
Rohlin is a freelance writer who frequently contributes to The Times
Diana Taurasi: Impassioned defense of the WNBA
11:59 AM, September 25, 2008
I had my appetite ruined on Saturday.
It happened right after I read Melissa Rohlin's piece "Why this woman is a fan of basketball, but not the WNBA." It's hard to tell what's worse about the commentary: a) that the opinion offered was so antiquated and un-evolved; b) that a woman would go out of her way to hate on such accomplished professional women; or c) that the reality is, there are people who actually share such a sheltered view.
Nevertheless, I can cosign on three sentiments conveyed by Ms. Rohlin: that the NBA does feature the best athletes and the highest level of basketball in the world, that women's sports receive far less media coverage than men's and that discussion is always healthy. Of course, those facts are as much of a news flash as word that an African American is running for president.
What may not be common knowledge, however, is that the WNBA features the world's best women's basketball, which was proven by the fact that 26 medals were awarded to current and former WNBA players. And, contrary to Ms. Rohlin's opinion, many think the WNBA is entertaining. She would've known that had she looked beyond the 12 girls "trying out" for the team at her alma mater.
Ratings, attendance and website traffic aren't up because it's boring. No offense to the caring progressives at ESPN, but the network didn't commit to pay millions for the right to exclusively televise WNBA games because it wants to, as Ms. Rohlin said, "support the cause." The WNBA, in its 12th year, is the longest-running, most-successful professional women's league in America because it IS entertaining.
Perhaps those like Ms. Rohlin who find us so boring are simply too close-minded to give the WNBA a chance, shackled by stereotypes, homophobia or an obsession with being accepted by men. Perhaps they aren't real basketball fans.
That's what makes the premise of Ms. Rohlin's commentary so absurd. It's not even possible to be a basketball fan and not be at least somewhat entertained by the WNBA. Sure, you can be an NBA fan and not have interest in our league. But basketball fans, real basketball fans -- who see the game as more than dunks and athleticism and personalities -- can enjoy all levels of basketball without being herded toward it by big-budget commercials. Yes, even varsity games at Palisades High.
Real basketball fans, like the NBA stars who watched our every game in Beijing, appreciate the game and its beauty, the athletes and their dedication, the competition and its intensity.
Will many think the NBA is more entertaining? Of course. How that means the WNBA is NOT entertaining is beyond me. That's what is disappointing, that when it comes to the WNBA, some people, even women such as Ms. Rohlin, (who can probably see Russia from her porch) still can only regard our league as the NBA's kid sister. Where was the NBA in its 12th season? Furthermore, the idea that if it isn't the MOST watched or MOST marketed that it isn't worthy is unfairly applied to women's sports. Such a rationale belies not only an ingrained sexism, but ignorance over the fact that NBA versus the WNBA doesn't have to be an either/or conundrum: we have different seasons.
Ms. Rohlin, are you a fan of college basketball, which doesn't feature Kobe Bryant or any of the world's best players? Is Serena Williams not entertaining because her serve isn't as fast as Andy Roddick's? Are you bored by sprint star Allyson Felix because women's 200-meter times haven't cracked the 20-second barrier like the men? What does Dara Torres mean to you?
The WNBA is celebrating its 12th season because women's basketball is proven entertainment, the league where the world's best come to play, and it's growing. The WNBA set a record with 46 sellouts this season. National TV ratings increased 19% over last year. Jersey sales jumped 46%.
Contrary to popular belief, men are watching the WNBA. Games on ESPN2 saw viewership among men ages 18-34 increase 28% (71% among women 18-34!). Attend a game and you'll regularly see NBA players sitting courtside.
Oh, and that lone player from the 12 Palisades varsity hopefuls you found that actually watched the WNBA? She just happens to be the best player on the team, the 23rd ranked scorer in Los Angeles' City Section.
It seems as if Ms. Rohlin and the L.A. Times are just late catching on. Fortunately, you still have a chance at redemption. I challenge anyone who calls themselves fans of basketball, or even just a fan of sport, to watch the 2008 playoffs. If you agreed with Ms. Rohlin, but teared up during the Olympics, pick a team and follow them through (Ms. Rohlin, I'll even get you some tickets to see it live. I already have Coach Brown bringing the Palisades team to the game Thursday). Or watch the WNBA Finals from start to finish. Media and sponsors? Lead the way and provide enhanced activation and coverage.
I guarantee you will be entertained.
-- Diana Taurasi
Diana Taurasi is a three-time WNBA All-Star with the Phoenix Mercury.
Why this woman is a fan of basketball, but not the WNBA
Like most people, she watches sports to be entertained, and that means when it comes to hoops, it’s all about the NBA.
By Melissa Rohlin
September 20, 2008
An explanation from one woman basketball fan – not a women’s basketball fan – who did not plan on being at Staples Center for the Sparks’ opening game in the playoffs against Seattle.
I have played basketball my entire life and dreamed of playing in the WNBA. I did anything and everything to accomplish my goal – everything except watch the WNBA.
I was the first person to show up at practice and I was the last person to leave the gym. Basketball was my life. I was so obsessed with the sport that my parents would punish any perceived bad behavior by forbidding me from going to the gym.
During this period, I watched every Lakers game and studied Kobe’s dunks and leaping skills, but I never tried to learn the moves and skills of the women with whom I actually dreamed of playing.
I returned to my alma mater, Palisades High, and discovered that I am not alone. Of the 12 girls hoping to make the basketball team this fall with whom I spoke, only one says that she regularly watches the WNBA. The majority say they regularly watch the NBA.
I wish that I had more interest in the WNBA. The players have doubtlessly overcome gender prejudices and a lot of adversity to achieve their status. They are examples of discipline and focus and are advancing the cause of gender equality while simultaneously destroying gender norms.
Unfortunately, I watch basketball to be entertained. I do not watch it to support a cause. And, quite frankly, men’s basketball is far more entertaining than women’s basketball. Simply stated: Men jump higher, run faster, and hit harder than women.
The celebration and media hype that ensued after Candace Parker’s first dunk in the WNBA emphasizes the difference between men’s and women’s basketball. Could you imagine if each player in the NBA received that kind of attention after a dunk debut? It would be comical. Dunking is practically as much of a requisite for playing in the NBA as dribbling is for the WNBA.
I am not trying to understate the significance of Parker’s feat. Her dunk was historic because she is a woman. But, why would basketball fans want to watch the WNBA where something generic is considered historic?
Not everyone feels the way I do. One Palisades varsity basketball hopeful, Dominique Scott, finds the WNBA more exciting than the NBA because she can better relate to women’s moves and tactics. She thinks that the showboating and dunking of the NBA detracts from the purity of the sport.
Unfortunately, most people do not agree with Dominique’s perspective, and since there is not much fan interest in the WNBA, there is also not much media coverage. “Studies have shown that men’s sports receive as much as 90% airtime as compared to a mere 7% airtime for women,” said Stephanie Sweet, who has a master’s degree in kinesiology from Long Beach State.
We are constantly bombarded with advertisements for the NBA. Even though my grandmother thinks that the Lakers are a football team, she still knows the dates and times of their games.
The WNBA, on the other hand, is virtually absent in the media. People have to actively research and seek out game times. Leora Sheily, a 16-year-old Palisades basketball player, said, “If I knew about Sparks games, I would watch them.”
Another reason the WNBA is underappreciated is the lack of male interest in the game. Very few of my friends who are girls share my passion for basketball, but most of my guy friends (even those who have no interest in playing the sport) love watching it. These guys only have an interest in the NBA. The WNBA is as foreign to them as cricket is to most Americans.
Another Palisades player, Ksenya Schvchuk, said: “Half of the fun of watching basketball is debating the games with my guy friends, and since none of them watch the WNBA, I have lost interest.”
Sweet explained that most guys accept women competing only in feminine sports such as volleyball and tennis. Men do not like watching women clad in baggy, long shorts competing in contact sports. This image directly opposes the prototype of the feminine woman who is revered in today’s society, and, as Sweet says, “Sports is a reflection of society.”
A lot of young female basketball players also shy away from watching the WNBA because of its reputation of having a large homosexual fan base. Some heterosexual girls are afraid that they themselves will be considered gay if they associate with something reputed as gay. Unfortunately, this discourages many young women from watching and talking about a sport in which they would otherwise have interest.
Even though my dream of playing professional basketball evaporated in high school, I still love watching the sport. Well, I love watching guys play the sport. The WNBA is for me, as it is for the majority of the potential Palisades varsity basketball players, nothing but an afterthought.
If the WNBA hopes to survive, it must at least pique the interest of female basketball players. I want the WNBA to survive. For now, by discussing our lack of interest in the WNBA, we are at least bringing it some attention.
Rohlin is a freelance writer who frequently contributes to The Times
Diana Taurasi: Impassioned defense of the WNBA
11:59 AM, September 25, 2008
I had my appetite ruined on Saturday.
It happened right after I read Melissa Rohlin's piece "Why this woman is a fan of basketball, but not the WNBA." It's hard to tell what's worse about the commentary: a) that the opinion offered was so antiquated and un-evolved; b) that a woman would go out of her way to hate on such accomplished professional women; or c) that the reality is, there are people who actually share such a sheltered view.
Nevertheless, I can cosign on three sentiments conveyed by Ms. Rohlin: that the NBA does feature the best athletes and the highest level of basketball in the world, that women's sports receive far less media coverage than men's and that discussion is always healthy. Of course, those facts are as much of a news flash as word that an African American is running for president.
What may not be common knowledge, however, is that the WNBA features the world's best women's basketball, which was proven by the fact that 26 medals were awarded to current and former WNBA players. And, contrary to Ms. Rohlin's opinion, many think the WNBA is entertaining. She would've known that had she looked beyond the 12 girls "trying out" for the team at her alma mater.
Ratings, attendance and website traffic aren't up because it's boring. No offense to the caring progressives at ESPN, but the network didn't commit to pay millions for the right to exclusively televise WNBA games because it wants to, as Ms. Rohlin said, "support the cause." The WNBA, in its 12th year, is the longest-running, most-successful professional women's league in America because it IS entertaining.
Perhaps those like Ms. Rohlin who find us so boring are simply too close-minded to give the WNBA a chance, shackled by stereotypes, homophobia or an obsession with being accepted by men. Perhaps they aren't real basketball fans.
That's what makes the premise of Ms. Rohlin's commentary so absurd. It's not even possible to be a basketball fan and not be at least somewhat entertained by the WNBA. Sure, you can be an NBA fan and not have interest in our league. But basketball fans, real basketball fans -- who see the game as more than dunks and athleticism and personalities -- can enjoy all levels of basketball without being herded toward it by big-budget commercials. Yes, even varsity games at Palisades High.
Real basketball fans, like the NBA stars who watched our every game in Beijing, appreciate the game and its beauty, the athletes and their dedication, the competition and its intensity.
Will many think the NBA is more entertaining? Of course. How that means the WNBA is NOT entertaining is beyond me. That's what is disappointing, that when it comes to the WNBA, some people, even women such as Ms. Rohlin, (who can probably see Russia from her porch) still can only regard our league as the NBA's kid sister. Where was the NBA in its 12th season? Furthermore, the idea that if it isn't the MOST watched or MOST marketed that it isn't worthy is unfairly applied to women's sports. Such a rationale belies not only an ingrained sexism, but ignorance over the fact that NBA versus the WNBA doesn't have to be an either/or conundrum: we have different seasons.
Ms. Rohlin, are you a fan of college basketball, which doesn't feature Kobe Bryant or any of the world's best players? Is Serena Williams not entertaining because her serve isn't as fast as Andy Roddick's? Are you bored by sprint star Allyson Felix because women's 200-meter times haven't cracked the 20-second barrier like the men? What does Dara Torres mean to you?
The WNBA is celebrating its 12th season because women's basketball is proven entertainment, the league where the world's best come to play, and it's growing. The WNBA set a record with 46 sellouts this season. National TV ratings increased 19% over last year. Jersey sales jumped 46%.
Contrary to popular belief, men are watching the WNBA. Games on ESPN2 saw viewership among men ages 18-34 increase 28% (71% among women 18-34!). Attend a game and you'll regularly see NBA players sitting courtside.
Oh, and that lone player from the 12 Palisades varsity hopefuls you found that actually watched the WNBA? She just happens to be the best player on the team, the 23rd ranked scorer in Los Angeles' City Section.
It seems as if Ms. Rohlin and the L.A. Times are just late catching on. Fortunately, you still have a chance at redemption. I challenge anyone who calls themselves fans of basketball, or even just a fan of sport, to watch the 2008 playoffs. If you agreed with Ms. Rohlin, but teared up during the Olympics, pick a team and follow them through (Ms. Rohlin, I'll even get you some tickets to see it live. I already have Coach Brown bringing the Palisades team to the game Thursday). Or watch the WNBA Finals from start to finish. Media and sponsors? Lead the way and provide enhanced activation and coverage.
I guarantee you will be entertained.
-- Diana Taurasi
Diana Taurasi is a three-time WNBA All-Star with the Phoenix Mercury.
posted by Tony at
11:04 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home